Wednesday 25 February 2015

The Social Network

The blog post previews
Even if you didn't know their name, we've all come across a CAPTCHA in one form or another. It's what stops the robots taking over the internet.


A CAPTCHA example

There are many alternatives out there, some using pictures, drag-and-drop, and all kinds of fancy features. They're pretty great at stopping the majority of spam or automated access, but where they really fall down is in weeding out people. I don't know if this would be better placed as part of the registration process to certain sites, or immediately before posting, but I'd welcome something along the lines of this...


An alternative to conventional CAPTCHA which requires basic grammar knowledge
The suggested use is before allowing access to the internet

Ladies and gentlemen, the Internet Access CAPTCHA. That's what we need - and here's why!

Let me take you on a journey across some of the wonderment one might find on social media. We'll meet three lovely people, discover their trials and tribulations, and hopefully we'll see where CAPTCHA could come in just that little bit handier.

Now, for the general purpose of protecting identities, the names are, naturally, not divulged; nor is any discernable personal details that could lead to any kind of identification. Strap yourselves in, it's gonna be a bumpy ride!

There are lots of things I wouldn't post online. Things that are personal. Falling out with a family member, for example. Some people choose to plaster such events all over the internet and, in fact, Article 10 of the Human Rights Act exists to ensure such people can do so. Good for them. If you're comfortable enough sharing things I'm not, I applaud you. Don't get me wrong, it's not like I have anything to hide, I just prefer to keep the vast majority of my private life, private. By accepting 'you' as a 'friend' on various outlets I accept that this means we are now privy to whatever either party chooses to share. I would, however, prefer it if you put at least a little thought into your posts. I'm a stickler for SPAG, for example - this would not only please me, but you might find that (much like the disruptive child in a class) your infrequent correct behaviour will be rewarded.

Poppy Cock's profile

Meet Poppy. I don't know her too well and I've absolutely no qualms with her. For whatever reason, her child had missed a (presumably) significant number of days at school and resultantly failed to qualify for some school event. This didn't sit all too well with Poppy and she resolved it the only way one could possibly do so - through the power of social media!

Poppy Cock complains about something which happened at school with her child on social media

In my opinion, this is something that falls into the 'maybe' column. Personally, I'd have dealt with the situation by liaising with the school and ascertaining all the facts, first. Were it to come to no resolution or, in fact, were it to come to a gleefully triumphant resolution, I may well have shared this with my friends and family - maybe even via social media. I wouldn't, however, direct the anger at the school for what could well have been a perfectly justified decision or an innocent mistake.

Phil Atterly's profile

Meet Phil. Disenfranchised by the social media world, he's just about had enough of all the liars and trouble-makers. Phil is so done that this will be his last post online - he will be gone come the morn.

Phil Atterly complains and wishes to leave social media

Much like a pigeon trapped in your living room, poor old Phil just couldn't work out why he could see the outside world, but couldn't get to it - and, bless him, he just kept hitting that window head-first. Not for all the chocolate in Wonka's factory could poor Phil work out how to follow through on his intention. This lead to a further tirade of statuses in which Phil would get more and more worked up over how difficult it was to leave and he went to new levels of 'done'.

Phil Atterly can't work out how to leave social media and ends up staying, moments later

For me, this is a firm 'no'. Not only would I have taken sufficient steps to ensure that my encounters with 'friends' (with the inverted commas) was kept to a minimum, I would hope it would never come to a time in which my only course of action was to threaten to leave - and then have to fumble my way around in order to close my account.

Matt Greene's profile

Meet Matt. Poor old Matt has been innocently looking forward to his birthday for months - twelve, in fact. Opening his 'main' present like the child who so desperately wants to unwrap the bike, but must dig through all the other presents first ("Look, mummy - a helment and gloves! What do I need those for - I haven't got a bike!"), Matt tore off his aesthetically-pleasing wrapping paper to discover a box. Not just any box, this was the box for which Matt had longed, for he knew that within it was a shiny new device that wouldn't work with gloves on or in the rain. Imagine the poor chap's face when he discovered that his 'big present' was the wrong colour! Now more disappointed than that time he wanted Harry Potter, but someone got him the book - which didn't have any of the Blu-Ray exclusive additional features he was looking forward to; Matt took to social media and, not being confronted with any form of CAPTCHA, was able to air his grievance with the world.

Matt Greene airs his anger at receiving the wrong coloured phone for his birthday

Now, don't get me wrong. Were I not to receive anything for my birthday, there'd be a part of me that would be disappointed; but I didn't earn anything. I'm not entitled to anything. Save for remembering to breathe, drink, and eat (which to be honest, I probably do too much of if anything), I have done very little to contribute to my being here for another year. What I definitely wouldn't do, is post my annoyance on the internet - to each their own, Matt. Another 'no' from me.

We need to treat the internet and its quirks such as social media with a great deal of respect. With them comes a great deal of power - and many a man has fought for your right to say even that with which he does not agree. In times like these, I look to Uncle Ben.

With great power comes great responsibility - Uncle Ben
(Ben, Uncle)
"Distracted from distraction by distraction"
(Not Uncle) Ben

Friday 6 February 2015

Tomorrow is a Long Time

If you haven't already read my review of 2014, I implore you to do so. I'll wait.

Excellent. Now we've got that out of the way, let's move promptly on...

So, what's been happening these past few weeks? Straight off the bat we had (what I can only assume was) an homage to Kirk Douglas as the majority of the world all proclaimed "Je suis Charlie!" - "Non! Je suis Charlie!". It wasn't as good as the original, but then again, the book's always better anyway.

The act sparked some pretty admirable responses and intellectual debates on various freedoms and injustices - but it also rolled out the first bandwagon for the social media generation to hop right on board; in turn prompting some less than educated opinions and, of course, creating an "us and them" divide between all manner of people.

It's safe to say, though, that none of us dropped the metaphoric ball quite as well as our buddies at Fox News. #smh

January oft brings out the worst in people. It's a chance for a fresh start and for us to lie to ourselves anew. Since nobody has the self-confidence to stand up and say "I know neither the lyrics nor the purpose for this!", the first real lie is when we all link arms and pretend to sing Auld Lang Syne. I remember one year, when a supermarket had the foresight to print the lyrics on the back of their receipts for the whole of December, so whomever had most recently bought 'bread and milk' was able to triumphantly lead us through a garbled recount of a poem set to the music of Cliff Richard's Millenium Prayer.



I digress. Those of us who committed to 'bettering themselves' or 'going to the gym' (or, heaven forbid, 'dry January') will have, inevitably, already broken this (doing twice as much 'tomorrow' or extending a day or two into February still counts as breaking it). Fear not though - Pancake Day is almost upon us, and we can kid ourselves into giving up/taking up things for 40 days (until we realise that 40 days is more than a month - and that's a long time!).


Every cloud does, however, have a silver lining - a beautiful, shimmering, glittery, rainbow lining. Some hero across the pond has, finally, released the product I've been longing for... Ship Someone Glitter! Now I can finally send glitter to those who pose a mild or infrequent annoyance. There's been a backlog since its comprehensible boom in popularity, but rest assured - yours is on its way just as soon as they clear it up!

Speaking of our feathery-hatted neighbours, there was a controversy in American HandFootball as they found that the balls had been less inflated than they should have been. In an epidemic that's been named "deflate-gate", American sportsmen failed to notice their balls weren't as big as they should have been, and a whole host of other blue, off the cuff, remarks. It might not be true though, because a fortunately named "Gay-Lussacs Law" may mean that the balls were innocently deflated because they went outside into the cold and shrivelled up. Ah, the 21st Century.

This segues rather nicely into the annual ultimate owl competition, in which I'm lead to believe somebody who didn't pass, should have? I don't understand much of the rules, but I have a very basic grounding and in the last half an hour of the game (which only spanned five actual game seconds), the losing team failed to score enough to make them the winning team - and in that ever-present sportsmanship fashion, the focus was on how the losing team were abysmal and absolutely no credit was given to the winners. In fact, I don't even know who won - just that the Seattle Seahawks lost this year's #SuperbOwl competition.

Left Shark was the real MVP anyway
For those who know me, I'm not a huge fan of theme parks or any derivative, and I'd rather catch measles than go to Disneyland - which must be why they now offer that as standard; creating two further bandwagons for us all to jump on... pro-/anti-vaccine.

Oh, so that's what those spots are...
As a poignant closing paragraph, I'd like to question the sanity of a world in which this product exists...
200ft./60m. Optical Thunderbolt cable
For a meagre £999 (that's right - pay with a £1000 note and get a pound back for your trolley!) you can buy a cable that is not only almost worth more than the devices you connect it to, but allows you to have said devices up to 60m away from one another.

Who's connecting these together?! Why does enough demand exist to stoke the supply fire?!
"Who are you people?!"
Ben